• A Blog from Motorola Mobility Home

    On broadband: video, voice, data, wireless and more!

    Click here

  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • 2011 SCTE Show

    See what Motorola announced at the 2011 SCTE Show!

    Click here
  • Feed

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • YouTube

Engineering IP Video

Video over IP Engineering IP video Motorola John Ulm SCTE Cable-tec expo

One of the great things about the SCTE show is the program of technical sessions available. Unlike other shows where session attendance can be quite sparse, the sessions at SCTE are often standing room only. Such was the case this morning when I crammed in to one conference room for presentations on Engineering IP Video. Two Motorolans were presenting, John Ulm and Robert Howald out of the Motorola CTO office for the Home and Networks Mobility business. The goal of both presentations was to articulate some of the technical challenges for cable IP video delivery and then show, through modeling, some of the options for clearing those hurdles.

Of the things I learned during the session, one of the most interesting was the reality of variable bit rate (VBR) delivery for IP video. The capacity gains for VBR are often touted at 40-50% or more over use of a constant bit rate (CBR). (More capacity means greater ability to deliver more content.) However, realistically, according to Ulm, the gains are only about 25% for MPEG-2 SD video, and maybe 20% for MPEG-4 AVC HD video. That’s when you factor in packet recovery. You can use statistical multiplexing with VBR delivery, but it turns out that statmuxing provides much greater benefit when used with static IP multicasting.

Another nugget I picked up was the comparative value of bonded versus unbonded channels for IP video delivery. Bonding provides greater efficiency, giving operators room for roughly two additional HD streams. Using unbonded channels, however, provides greater flexibility. You know all of those set-tops out there with embedded DOCSIS? Well, they don’t support channel bonding yet. Operators can’t deliver IP video over bonded channels to those DOCSIS set-tops currently being shipped to consumer homes.

The migration to IP for cable operators will be fascinating as it starts to take place. And while a year ago I might have said we have a long time before that happens, the buzz at SCTE this year suggests the process could start sooner than many expected. Certainly there’s a lot of research and planning taking place now.

4 Responses

  1. […] from Motorola’s CTO office have been getting around. Last month John Ulm presented on engineering IP video at SCTE, and this month Dan Tell took the stage to talk mobile video at the Telco TV show. His […]

  2. […] (VBR) can enable 50% more video streams than constant bit rate encoding (CBR). According to a Motorola paper presented back at SCTE, however, that projection for VBR might be a bit rosy. Factoring in packet recovery appears to […]

  3. […] written here several times about the challenges and opportunities cable operators face in migrating to IP delivery. There is a […]

  4. […] IP to support similar features, but it has certain advantages (like easier interoperability) that cable operators have also shown an interest in. Meanwhile, AT&T seems to be hitting its stride, using IP to differentiate itself in the form […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: