• A Blog from Motorola Mobility Home

    On broadband: video, voice, data, wireless and more!

    Click here

  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • 2011 SCTE Show

    See what Motorola announced at the 2011 SCTE Show!

    Click here
  • Feed

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • YouTube

What Ever Happened to CMTS Silver?

When DOCSIS 3.0 certifications and qualifications kicked into full gear a couple years back, one of the big tests for CMTS companies was how they got rated in the CableLabs tiered qualification system. There were bronze, silver, and gold levels, and the key to achieving silver was to prove upstream channel bonding capabilities. Fast forward to today, and the grading system is virtually forgotten. Upstream channel bonding? The early deployments don’t amount to much. Turns out it wasn’t enough just to prove you could do it in a lab. The real-world environment has shown you have to have the right platform underneath the technology to bring any kind of value to the upstream equation.

Here’s where we are now. The original upstream channel bonding trials failed because the solutions used were based on ten-year-old DOCSIS 2.0 silicon technology. Only with a high-density CMTS card does channel bonding actually work. And for practical purposes, it’s got to come as part of an integrated CMTS architecture rather than a modular one. As one Motorolan put it to me yesterday, the BSR 64000 RX48 is the only integrated CMTS blade available that is capable of future proofing the HFC network for the next decade. It’s got the density required, and it’s ready for the hockey stick pattern of upstream demand that we’re likely to see in the next one to two years.

So what ever happened to the silver-level CMTS? It no longer matters. The real upstream channel bonding action is ahead in 2011.

3 Responses

  1. Unfortunately I missed Jeff Finkelstein’s discussion on upstream planning. Next generation silicon and RF expertise are certainly going to help Upstream Channel Bonding succeed in some limited way, but it seems to me SCDMA and/or 5-85 will have key roles to play as well to get beyond 2 channels. There’s just not enough usable spectrum in 5-42.

  2. Sadly I missed the session too. Agreed on the SCDMA point. Run a search on this site, and you’ll see I’ve written on the promise of SCDMA before.

  3. […] MSOs are raising their numbers of DOCSIS channels to handle both the overall increase in broadband capacity needed, and consumer demands for greater speed. Downstream channel bonding is now in widespread use across the country, and while many operators are only bonding two or three channels at a time today, that number will continue to grow in response to increasing speed requirements. Upstream channel bonding is not far behind. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: